Table Expressions
A table expression computes a table. The table expression contains a FROM clause that is optionally followed by WHERE, GROUP BY, and HAVING clauses. Trivial table expressions simply refer to a table on disk, a so-called base table, but more complex expressions can be used to modify or combine base tables in various ways.
The optional WHERE, GROUP BY, and HAVING clauses in the table expression specify a pipeline of successive transformations performed on the table derived in the FROM clause. All these transformations produce a virtual table that provides the rows that are passed to the select list to compute the output rows of the query.
The FROM Clause
The FROM clause derives a table from one or more other tables given in a comma-separated table reference list.
A table reference can be a table name (possibly schema-qualified), or a derived table such as a subquery, a JOIN construct, or complex combinations of these. If more than one table reference is listed in the FROM clause, the tables are cross-joined (that is, the Cartesian product of their rows is formed; see below). The result of the FROM list is an intermediate virtual table that can then be subject to transformations by the WHERE, GROUP BY, and HAVING clauses and is finally the result of the overall table expression.
When a table reference names a table that is the parent of a table inheritance hierarchy, the table reference produces rows of not only that table but all of its descendant tables, unless the key word ONLY precedes the table name. However, the reference produces only the columns that appear in the named table — any columns added in subtables are ignored.
Instead of writing ONLY before the table name, you can write * after the table name to explicitly specify that descendant tables are included. There is no real reason to use this syntax any more, because searching descendant tables is now always the default behavior. However, it is supported for compatibility with older releases.
Joined Tables
A joined table is a table derived from two other (real or derived) tables according to the rules of the particular join type. Inner, outer, and cross-joins are available. The general syntax of a joined table is
Joins of all types can be chained together, or nested: either or both T1 and T2 can be joined tables. Parentheses can be used around JOIN clauses to control the join order. In the absence of parentheses, JOIN clauses nest left-to-right.
Join Types
Cross join
For every possible combination of rows from
T1andT2(i.e., a Cartesian product), the joined table will contain a row consisting of all columns inT1followed by all columns inT2. If the tables have N and M rows respectively, the joined table will have N * M rows.FROM `T1` CROSS JOIN `T2`is equivalent toFROM `T1` INNER JOIN `T2` ON TRUE(see below). It is also equivalent toFROM `T1`, `T2`.This latter equivalence does not hold exactly when more than two tables appear, becauseJOINbinds more tightly than comma. For exampleFROM `T1` CROSS JOIN `T2` INNER JOIN `T3` ON `condition`is not the same asFROM `T1`, `T2` INNER JOIN `T3` ON `condition`because theconditioncan referenceT1in the first case but not the second.Qualified joins
The words
INNERandOUTERare optional in all forms.INNERis the default;LEFT,RIGHT, andFULLimply an outer join.The join condition is specified in the
ONorUSINGclause, or implicitly by the wordNATURAL. The join condition determines which rows from the two source tables are considered to “match”, as explained in detail below.The possible types of qualified join are:
INNER JOINFor each row R1 of T1, the joined table has a row for each row in T2 that satisfies the join condition with R
LEFT OUTER JOINFirst, an inner join is performed. Then, for each row in T1 that does not satisfy the join condition with any row in T2, a joined row is added with null values in columns of TThus, the joined table always has at least one row for each row in T
RIGHT OUTER JOINFirst, an inner join is performed. Then, for each row in T2 that does not satisfy the join condition with any row in T1, a joined row is added with null values in columns of TThis is the converse of a left join: the result table will always have a row for each row in T
FULL OUTER JOINFirst, an inner join is performed. Then, for each row in T1 that does not satisfy the join condition with any row in T2, a joined row is added with null values in columns of TAlso, for each row of T2 that does not satisfy the join condition with any row in T1, a joined row with null values in the columns of T1 is added.
The
ONclause is the most general kind of join condition: it takes a Boolean value expression of the same kind as is used in aWHEREclause. A pair of rows fromT1andT2match if theONexpression evaluates to true.The
USINGclause is a shorthand that allows you to take advantage of the specific situation where both sides of the join use the same name for the joining column(s). It takes a comma-separated list of the shared column names and forms a join condition that includes an equality comparison for each one. For example, joiningT1andT2withUSING (a, b)produces the join conditionON `T1`.a = `T2`.a AND `T1`.b = `T2`.b.Furthermore, the output of
JOIN USINGsuppresses redundant columns: there is no need to print both of the matched columns, since they must have equal values. WhileJOIN ONproduces all columns fromT1followed by all columns fromT2,JOIN USINGproduces one output column for each of the listed column pairs (in the listed order), followed by any remaining columns fromT1, followed by any remaining columns fromT2.Finally,
NATURALis a shorthand form ofUSING: it forms aUSINGlist consisting of all column names that appear in both input tables. As withUSING, these columns appear only once in the output table. If there are no common column names,NATURAL JOINbehaves likeJOIN ... ON TRUE, producing a cross-product join.USINGis reasonably safe from column changes in the joined relations since only the listed columns are combined.NATURALis considerably more risky since any schema changes to either relation that cause a new matching column name to be present will cause the join to combine that new column as well.
To put this together, assume we have tables t1:
and t2:
then we get the following results for the various joins:
The join condition specified with ON can also contain conditions that do not relate directly to the join. This can prove useful for some queries but needs to be thought out carefully. For example:
Notice that placing the restriction in the WHERE clause produces a different result:
This is because a restriction placed in the ON clause is processed before the join, while a restriction placed in the WHERE clause is processed after the join. That does not matter with inner joins, but it matters a lot with outer joins.
Table and Column Aliases
A temporary name can be given to tables and complex table references to be used for references to the derived table in the rest of the query. This is called a table alias.
To create a table alias, write
or
The AS key word is optional noise. alias can be any identifier.
A typical application of table aliases is to assign short identifiers to long table names to keep the join clauses readable. For example:
The alias becomes the new name of the table reference so far as the current query is concerned — it is not allowed to refer to the table by the original name elsewhere in the query. Thus, this is not valid:
Table aliases are mainly for notational convenience, but it is necessary to use them when joining a table to itself, e.g.:
Additionally, an alias is required if the table reference is a subquery (see Section 6.2.1.3).
Parentheses are used to resolve ambiguities. In the following example, the first statement assigns the alias b to the second instance of my_table, but the second statement assigns the alias to the result of the join:
Another form of table aliasing gives temporary names to the columns of the table, as well as the table itself:
If fewer column aliases are specified than the actual table has columns, the remaining columns are not renamed. This syntax is especially useful for self-joins or subqueries.
When an alias is applied to the output of a JOIN clause, the alias hides the original name(s) within the JOIN. For example:
is valid SQL, but:
is not valid; the table alias a is not visible outside the alias c.
Subqueries
Subqueries specifying a derived table must be enclosed in parentheses and must be assigned a table alias name (as in Section 6.2.1.2). For example:
This example is equivalent to FROM table1 AS alias_name. More interesting cases, which cannot be reduced to a plain join, arise when the subquery involves grouping or aggregation.
A subquery can also be a VALUES list:
Again, a table alias is required. Assigning alias names to the columns of the VALUES list is optional, but is good practice. For more information see Section 6.7.
LATERAL Subqueries
Subqueries appearing in FROM can be preceded by the key word LATERAL. This allows them to reference columns provided by preceding FROM items. (Without LATERAL, each subquery is evaluated independently and so cannot cross-reference any other FROM item.)
Table functions appearing in FROM can also be preceded by the key word LATERAL, but for functions the key word is optional; the function's arguments can contain references to columns provided by preceding FROM items in any case.
A LATERAL item can appear at top level in the FROM list, or within a JOIN tree. In the latter case it can also refer to any items that are on the left-hand side of a JOIN that it is on the right-hand side of.
When a FROM item contains LATERAL cross-references, evaluation proceeds as follows: for each row of the FROM item providing the cross-referenced column(s), or set of rows of multiple FROM items providing the columns, the LATERAL item is evaluated using that row or row set's values of the columns. The resulting row(s) are joined as usual with the rows they were computed from. This is repeated for each row or set of rows from the column source table(s).
A trivial example of LATERAL is
This is not especially useful since it has exactly the same result as the more conventional
LATERAL is primarily useful when the cross-referenced column is necessary for computing the row(s) to be joined. A common application is providing an argument value for a set-returning function. For example, supposing that vertices(polygon) returns the set of vertices of a polygon, we could identify close-together vertices of polygons stored in a table with:
This query could also be written
or in several other equivalent formulations. (As already mentioned, the LATERAL key word is unnecessary in this example, but we use it for clarity.)
It is often particularly handy to LEFT JOIN to a LATERAL subquery, so that source rows will appear in the result even if the LATERAL subquery produces no rows for them. For example, if get_product_names() returns the names of products made by a manufacturer, but some manufacturers in our table currently produce no products, we could find out which ones those are like this:
The WHERE Clause
The syntax of the WHERE clause is
where search_condition is any value expression (see Section 3.2) that returns a value of type boolean.
After the processing of the FROM clause is done, each row of the derived virtual table is checked against the search condition. If the result of the condition is true, the row is kept in the output table, otherwise (i.e., if the result is false or null) it is discarded. The search condition typically references at least one column of the table generated in the FROM clause; this is not required, but otherwise the WHERE clause will be fairly useless.
WHERE clause or in the JOIN clause. For example, these table expressions are equivalent:and:
or perhaps even:
Which one of these you use is mainly a matter of style. The JOIN syntax in the FROM clause is probably not as portable to other SQL database management systems, even though it is in the SQL standard. For outer joins there is no choice: they must be done in the FROM clause. The ON or USING clause of an outer join is not equivalent to a WHERE condition, because it results in the addition of rows (for unmatched input rows) as well as the removal of rows in the final result.
Here are some examples of WHERE clauses:
fdt is the table derived in the FROM clause. Rows that do not meet the search condition of the WHERE clause are eliminated from fdt. Notice the use of scalar subqueries as value expressions. Just like any other query, the subqueries can employ complex table expressions. Notice also how fdt is referenced in the subqueries. Qualifying c1 as fdt.c1 is only necessary if c1 is also the name of a column in the derived input table of the subquery. But qualifying the column name adds clarity even when it is not needed. This example shows how the column naming scope of an outer query extends into its inner queries.
The GROUP BY and HAVING Clauses
After passing the WHERE filter, the derived input table might be subject to grouping, using the GROUP BY clause, and elimination of group rows using the HAVING clause.
The GROUP BY clause is used to group together those rows in a table that have the same values in all the columns listed. The order in which the columns are listed does not matter. The effect is to combine each set of rows having common values into one group row that represents all rows in the group. This is done to eliminate redundancy in the output and/or compute aggregates that apply to these groups. For instance:
In the second query, we could not have written SELECT * FROM test1 GROUP BY x, because there is no single value for the column y that could be associated with each group. The grouped-by columns can be referenced in the select list since they have a single value in each group.
In general, if a table is grouped, columns that are not listed in GROUP BY cannot be referenced except in aggregate expressions. An example with aggregate expressions is:
Here sum is an aggregate function that computes a single value over the entire group. More information about the available aggregate functions can be found in Section 8.17.
DISTINCT clause (see Section 6.3.3).In this example, the columns product_id, p.name, and p.price must be in the GROUP BY clause since they are referenced in the query select list (but see below). The column s.units does not have to be in the GROUP BY list since it is only used in an aggregate expression (sum(...)), which represents the sales of a product. For each product, the query returns a summary row about all sales of the product.
If the products table is set up so that, say, product_id is the primary key, then it would be enough to group by product_id in the above example, since name and price would be functionally dependent on the product ID, and so there would be no ambiguity about which name and price value to return for each product ID group.
In strict SQL, GROUP BY can only group by columns of the source table but Tacnode extends this to also allow GROUP BY to group by columns in the select list. Grouping by value expressions instead of simple column names is also allowed.
If a table has been grouped using GROUP BY, but only certain groups are of interest, the HAVING clause can be used, much like a WHERE clause, to eliminate groups from the result. The syntax is:
Expressions in the HAVING clause can refer both to grouped expressions and to ungrouped expressions (which necessarily involve an aggregate function).
Example:
Again, a more realistic example:
In the example above, the WHERE clause is selecting rows by a column that is not grouped (the expression is only true for sales during the last four weeks), while the HAVING clause restricts the output to groups with total gross sales over Note that the aggregate expressions do not necessarily need to be the same in all parts of the query.
If a query contains aggregate function calls, but no GROUP BY clause, grouping still occurs: the result is a single group row (or perhaps no rows at all, if the single row is then eliminated by HAVING). The same is true if it contains a HAVING clause, even without any aggregate function calls or GROUP BY clause.
Window Function Processing
If the query contains any window functions (see Section 2.5, Section 8.18 and Section 3.2.8), these functions are evaluated after any grouping, aggregation, and HAVING filtering is performed. That is, if the query uses any aggregates, GROUP BY, or HAVING, then the rows seen by the window functions are the group rows instead of the original table rows from FROM/WHERE.
When multiple window functions are used, all the window functions having syntactically equivalent PARTITION BY and ORDER BY clauses in their window definitions are guaranteed to be evaluated in a single pass over the data. Therefore they will see the same sort ordering, even if the ORDER BY does not uniquely determine an ordering. However, no guarantees are made about the evaluation of functions having different PARTITION BY or ORDER BY specifications. (In such cases a sort step is typically required between the passes of window function evaluations, and the sort is not guaranteed to preserve ordering of rows that its ORDER BY sees as equivalent.)
Currently, window functions always require presorted data, and so the query output will be ordered according to one or another of the window functions' PARTITION BY/ORDER BY clauses. It is not recommended to rely on this, however. Use an explicit top-level ORDER BY clause if you want to be sure the results are sorted in a particular way.